Homecare workers - an untapped resource in preventing emergency department visits among older individuals? A qualitative interview study from Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Older individuals with functional decline and homecare are frequent visitors to emergency departments (ED). Homecare workers (HCWs) interact regularly with their clients and may play a crucial role in their well-being. Therefore, this study explores if and how HCWs perceive they may contribute to the prevention of ED visits among their clients. METHODS: In this qualitative study, 12 semi-structured interviews were conducted with HCWs from Sweden between July and November 2022. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify barriers and facilitators to prevent ED visits in older home-dwelling individuals. RESULTS: HCWs want to actively contribute to the prevention of ED visits among clients but observe many barriers that hinder them from doing so. Barriers refer to care organisation such as availability to primary care staff and information transfer; perceived attitudes towards HCWs as co-workers; and client-related factors. Participants suggest that improved communication and collaboration with primary care and discharge information from the ED to homecare services could overcome barriers. Furthermore, they ask for support and geriatric education from primary care nurses which may result in increased respect towards them as competent staff members. CONCLUSIONS: HCWs feel that they have an important role in the health management of older individuals living at home. Still, they feel as an untapped resource in the prevention of ED visits. They deem that improved coordination and communication between primary care, ED, and homecare organisations as well as proactive care would enable them to add significantly to the prevention of ED visits.

Profiling chronic diseases and hospitalizations in older home care recipients: a nationwide cohort study in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Older adults with home care (HC) often have complex disease patterns and use healthcare extensively. Increased understanding is necessary to tailor their care. To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe patterns of morbidity and hospitalizations among community-dwelling older HC recipients nationwide and in subgroups defined by age, sex, and amount of HC, and to compare patterns to community-dwelling older adults without HC. METHODS: Nationwide register-based cohort study in community-dwelling adults aged 70 and older receiving publicly funded HC in Sweden on January 1st 2019 and an age-and-sex matched comparison group ("non-HC recipients"). Using register data from inpatient and specialized outpatient care, we assessed the prevalence of sixty chronic diseases, frailty, multimorbidity and hospitalizations, calculated incidence rates and explored reasons for hospitalizations during two years of follow-up. RESULTS: We identified 138,113 HC recipients (mean age 85, 66% women, 57% ≥5 chronic diseases). The most prevalent diseases were hypertension (55%) and eye conditions (48%). Compared to non-HC recipients, HC recipients had a higher prevalence of almost all diseases, with an overrepresentation of neurological (26.1 vs. 9.5%) disease and dementia (9.3 vs. 1.5%). 61% of HC recipients were hospitalized at least once during two years, which was 1.6 times as often as non-HC recipients. One third of HC recipients´ hospitalizations (37.4%) were due to injuries, infections, and heart failure. Hospitalizations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, confusion, infections, and breathing difficulties were 3-5 times higher among HC recipients compared to non-HC recipients. CONCLUSION: Compared to non-HC recipients, HC recipients more often live alone, have higher degrees of frailty, suffer from more chronic diseases, especially neurological disease, and are hospitalized almost twice as often. The results provide a thorough description of HC recipients, which might be useful for targeted healthcare interventions including closer collaboration between primary care, neurologists, and rehabilitation.

Blood biomarker profiles and exceptional longevity: comparison of centenarians and non-centenarians in a 35-year follow-up of the Swedish AMORIS cohort.

Comparing biomarker profiles measured at similar ages, but earlier in life, among exceptionally long-lived individuals and their shorter-lived peers can improve our understanding of aging processes. This study aimed to (i) describe and compare biomarker profiles at similar ages between 64 and 99 among individuals eventually becoming centenarians and their shorter-lived peers, (ii) investigate the association between specific biomarker values and the chance of reaching age 100, and (iii) examine to what extent centenarians have homogenous biomarker profiles earlier in life. Participants in the population-based AMORIS cohort with information on blood-based biomarkers measured during 1985-1996 were followed in Swedish register data for up to 35 years. We examined biomarkers of metabolism, inflammation, liver, renal, anemia, and nutritional status using descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and cluster analysis. In total, 1224 participants (84.6% females) lived to their 100th birthday. Higher levels of total cholesterol and iron and lower levels of glucose, creatinine, uric acid, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, and total iron-binding capacity were associated with reaching 100 years. Centenarians overall displayed rather homogenous biomarker profiles. Already from age 65 and onwards, centenarians displayed more favorable biomarker values in commonly available biomarkers than individuals dying before age 100. The differences in biomarker values between centenarians and non-centenarians more than one decade prior death suggest that genetic and/or possibly modifiable lifestyle factors reflected in these biomarker levels may play an important role for exceptional longevity.

"Returning to the core tasks": a qualitative interview study about how general practitioners in home health care solved problems during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: Optimizing care at home, or home health care (HHC), is necessary as the population of care-dependent older people receiving care at home steadily increases. The COVID-19 pandemic tested Swedish primary care professionals as they provided HHC for a population of very frail older homebound people, but a better understanding of what healthcare workers did to manage the crisis may be useful for the further development of HHC. In this study, we aimed to understand how HHC physicians solved the problems of providing home healthcare during the pandemic to learn lessons on how to improve future HHC. METHODS: This is a qualitative study of individual interviews with 11 primary care physicians working in HHC (8 women) from 7 primary care practices in Region Stockholm, Sweden. Interviews were conducted between 1 December 2020, and 11 March 2021. The data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: We generated an overarching theme in our analysis: Physicians focus on core tasks and professional values in response to crisis. This theme incorporated three underlying subthemes describing this response: physicians prioritize and resolve ethically challenging situations in new ways, cultivate the patient perspective, and build on existing teams. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that a healthcare system that gives HHC physicians agency to focus on core tasks and professional values could promote person-centered care.

Optimizing care at home, or home health care (HHC), is necessary as the population of care-dependent older people receiving care at home steadily increases.During the COVID-19 pandemic, HHC physicians in Stockholm were able work person-centred and focus on clinically relevant tasks.A healthcare system that allows HHC physicians to focus on core tasks and professional values can promote person-centered care.Strategies to promote quality HHC include supporting physician autonomy, building on existing teams, and promoting collaboration between primary care providers and other caregivers.

How much are we worth? Experiences of nursing assistants in Swedish nursing homes during the first wave of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: NHs have been severely exposed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Little is known about how staff who provide practical daily care of older residents experienced work during the pandemic. The aim of this study was to understand how nursing assistants (NAs) experienced their work at nursing homes (NHs) for older people during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study of focus group discussions with in total 20 participants from four NHs in Stockholm, Sweden. Discussions were held in November 2020. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: We identified three major themes: 1) We felt abandoned, scared and disrespected, 2) We made sure we made it through, and 3) We can do good work with appropriate resources. NAs felt disregarded as they were often left alone without adequate support from managers, registered nurses and the municipalities. NAs felt distressed and guilty and developed their own strategies to cope and manage their work. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic NAs felt abandoned and burdened due to lack of leadership. Organizational improvements are required to protect the wellbeing of NAs and to ensure sustainability of patient safety. NAs are crucial in the care for vulnerable older people and their experiences should constitute a keystone for development of future policy and practice in NHs.

Experiences of patients receiving Home Care and living with polypharmacy: a qualitative interview study.

BACKGROUND: In Sweden, patients receiving Home Care (HC) are older people with frailty and multimorbidity, and are often treated with many medicines. Their perspectives on polypharmacy have been sparsely explored. AIM: To investigate HC patients' experiences and perceptions regarding polypharmacy. DESIGN & SETTING: Semi-structured interviews with 17 patients with HC in Stockholm, Sweden. METHOD: The interview questions were open and aimed to encourage participants to speak freely about their personal experiences of living with polypharmacy. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: The participants' median age was 83.5 years (range 74-97 years) and the median number of prescribed medicines was 11 (range 5-30). The following two themes were identified: (1) experiences from daily life with polypharmacy; and (2) dependency on the relationship to healthcare professionals. The first theme contains the main finding, which was the diversity in how older people experienced polypharmacy and how they coped with polypharmacy in everyday life. While some were satisfied despite having multiple medicines, others experienced such psychological unease owing to polypharmacy that it led to reduced quality of life. The second theme reflects the importance of the relationship between the older person and healthcare professionals for medicine-related ideas and attitudes. CONCLUSION: The individual variation in experiences regarding polypharmacy points to the value of interprofessional teamwork with the patient as an active partner. Therefore, healthcare professionals need to adapt a more person-centred approach where the patient's perspectives are respected and considered in medicine-related decisionmaking.

Drug-disease interactions in Swedish senior primary care patients were dominated by non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs and hypertension - a population-based registry study.

OBJECTIVE: Drug-disease interactions (DDSIs) are present when a drug prescribed for one disease worsens a concomitant disease. The prevalence of DDSIs in older patients in primary care is largely unknown, as well as to what extent physicians individualize drug prescribing in relation to concomitant diseases. We therefore analysed the prevalence of DDSIs in older patients in primary care and explored to what extent physicians take possible DDSIs into account when prescribing. Design and Setting: Cross-sectional population-based register study in primary care in Region Stockholm, Sweden. Thirty-one DDSIs derived from Irish STOPP-START-Criteria were assessed. We derived data from a regional administrative healthcare database including information on all healthcare consultations and dispensed prescription drugs in the region. Data on demography, diagnoses, drug dispensations and healthcare consumption were extracted. Drugs were assessed during 2016. SUBJECTS: A total of 336,295 patients aged ≥65 registered with one of the 206 primary care practices in Region Stockholm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence and prevalence differences for DDSIs. RESULTS: In 10.8% of older patients, at least one DDSI was observed. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were implicated in more than 75% of cases. The most common DDSI was NSAID/hypertension (8.1%), followed by NSAID/cardiovascular disease and loop diuretics/urinary incontinence (both 0.7%). The use of NSAIDs among patients with heart failure or impaired renal function was 15% lower than among patients without these diseases. CONCLUSION: DDSIs were present in every tenth older patient in primary care. Patients with cardiovascular disease receive NSAIDs to a lower extent, possibly indicating physician awareness of DDSI. Key points Evidence on the prevalence of drug-disease interactions in older patients in primary care is sparse despite their potential to cause harm. In this study, we found that every 10th older patient attending primary care had at least one drug-disease interaction. Interactions with NSAIDs were far more common than interactions with other drugs. The use of NSAIDs among patients with heart failure or impaired renal function was 15% lower than among patients without these diseases.

Prevalence of renally inappropriate medicines in older people with renal impairment - A cross-sectional register-based study in a large primary care population.

The aim of this population-based, cross-sectional study was to analyse the prevalence of renally inappropriate medicines (RIMs) in older people with renal impairment. We included 30 372 people aged ≥65 years with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3, and 2161 with stage 4 attending primary care in Stockholm, Sweden. We used data derived from SCREAM, a database linking patient-specific data on demography, morbidity, healthcare consumption and dispensed drugs to creatinine measurements. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated with CKD-EPI based on the first non-hospital serum creatinine in 2010. RIMs were defined as medicines needing dose adjustment or being contra-indicated in CKD stage 3 or 4 with reference to Swedish "Janusmed Drugs and Renal function." Dispensed prescription drugs were analysed during 1 year after creatinine assessment. Drug doses were considered as excessive if their mean volume dispensed per day exceeded the recommended dose. Contra-indicated medicines were regarded as inappropriate if dispensed at least once during 1 year. Excessive dosing was present in 42.5% of older people with CKD stage 3 and in 58.1% with stage 4. The prevalence of contra-indicated medicines was 9.4% and 38.0%, respectively. A limited number of RIMs accounted for the majority of excessive dosing, such as drugs acting on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, betablockers and opioids. Commonly dispensed contra-indicated substances were NSAIDs and antidiabetics. We conclude that the prevalence of RIMs in older people with renal impairment is considerably high. Still, RIM use may be manageable as only a limited number of RIMs are frequently used.

Electronic assessment of cardiovascular potentially inappropriate medications in an administrative population database.

AIM: To explore the feasibility of the electronic assessment of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) criteria in a large administrative database and to explore the validity of the cardiovascular subset of PIM criteria, by studying the association with relevant outcome. METHOD: A cohort study using administrative data from Stockholm County, Sweden (VAL database). Eligible for inclusion were community-dwelling older people (≥65 years), alive in Stockholm County on 31 December 2015. We applied PIM criteria pertaining to the cardiovascular medication group (first-level ATC C group), and we assessed the association between PIM use and mortality and hospitalisation. RESULTS: Patients' (n = 315 120) mean age was 74.0 years (range 65-114), and 54.7% were women. There were 111 cardiovascular PIM criteria in the repository, from which 44 were not registered or prescribed in our population. We excluded another 43 requiring information not available in the database, or duplicates, resulting in 24 applicable criteria. The prevalence of polypharmacy (≥ five medications) was 25.5% and the prevalence of at least one PIM use was 8.3%, including 2.8% underuse and 5.3% misuse. Patients with intake of ≥10 medications had 38% increased mortality risk compared to those with 0-4 medications. Unplanned hospitalisation and emergency department visits were positively associated with underuse (12% and 25%, respectively) and misuse (13% and 12%, respectively). CONCLUSION: It was feasible to select a subset of cardiovascular PIM criteria originating from different PIM lists and to apply this subset in an administrative database. Additionally, by applying this subset, we showed significant associations with clinical outcome.